Pressing issues: Using parking machines

14 Jul 2014

It’s easier for a municipality to have central machines that dispense tickets for parking than to have individual meters. But they’re not always designed well. Here are two examples, one easier than the other. Neither takes credit cards, which complicates the UI in other machines.

The first one is in Belmont, Mass. While the display is a bit dim, it’s very easy to use.

The next one is in the neighboring town of Arlington, Mass. They put all those stickers on the machine because it’s so hard to use otherwise. Even the coin slot is labeled! When I was at the farmers’ market last summer, I saw a town employee who took people’s money and ran the machine for them.

That’s an expensive side effect of poor design.

Parking machine in the town lots in Belmont, MA

Parking machine in the town lots in Belmont, MA. It’s a little hard to read, but easy enough to use.

Parking machine in the town lots in Arlington, MA

Parking machine in the town lots in Arlington, MA. All those stickers are supposed to help with the UI. What do you think?


Pressing issues: using a public bathroom

7 Jul 2014

Soap on the right, water on the left. How do you use them?

After pressing the top of the soap dispenser, I pressed the top of the faucet. Nothing.

I see now that the three little openings at the bottom of the faucet stem indicate a sensor, but I was going to wash my face and didn’t have my glasses on. It’s a lovely design, but the inconsistency confused me. Each time I visited the Museum of Fine Arts and used this bathroom! I think now that I’ve written this post, I’ll remember!

MFA bathroom sink fixtures

How do you get soap? How do you get water?


Pressing issues: How do you use an elevator?

1 Jul 2014

I rode in this elevator multiple times recently, and each time pressed the numbers instead of the buttons. It’s not an unusual design, but to me, the floor numbers always stand out much more than the buttons. Have you ever had that problem?

MIT Stata Center elevator

Quick: What do you press?

At the time, I didn’t even notice that there’s no second floor!


Electric drill with a magnetic tray for screws

13 Jun 2013

We had some contractors in the house recently. I noticed that one of them had a cordless drill with a tray holding the screws he was going to use. I asked him about it and he said that it was magnetic and held the screws until he needed them. The tip is also magnetic, so the screw he was putting in wouldn’t fall out. He also liked that there’s a bubble level on the top, so he knows if he’s putting the screw in right.

Drill with magnetic parts

Features like levels, magnetic trays and magnetic tips are important to users like contractors who use a drill constantly. These features come from good customer research.

 

 

 

 

 


A simple solution for elder security

17 Apr 2013

I was visiting at a senior living community lately, and saw a great low-tech security device.

Security marker set

Security personnel walk the halls overnight, flipping these little markers up against the doors of each apartment…

Security marker released

… and when the resident opens the door, the marker falls. Security staff walk through the halls during the morning and can check on anyone whose marker isn’t released.


Comments about online commenting

3 Jan 2013

Do you write comments online? Commenting is available all over the Web. It’s a great feature, but there are some things that can hold people back from using it.

In usability studies, I’ve seen people hesitate about writing comments for many reasons. (Even so, I hope you comment about your experiences, below.)

Example of a commenting UI

Example of the commenting UI in this blog

Social factors affecting posting & comments

People are concerned about what others will think of them. Unless you’re really sure of your point, questioning someone online, especially an expert, can seem scary. I’ve heard participants say that in usability studies.

In his book Design to Thrive: Creating Social Networks and Online Communities, Tharon W. Howard writes:

Because people don’t want to damage their reputation or their professional status in the community, they won’t post unless they’re fairly sure that their contribution will be received as a contribution and will not open them up to critique.

He suggests demonstrating “how [members] can ask questions productively” and in general, creating a safe and comfortable environment.

Anonymity and rude comments

Anonymity can make people more comfortable about posting comments, but if my local newspaper’s site is any indication, it encourages some people to be rude. A recent usability participant talked about that:

Online, people everywhere are willing to insult people’s mothers at the drop of the hat. Anonymity leads to people saying a lot of things.

On the NPR program, Science Friday, Dominique Brossard, lead author of a paper in the journal Science (“Science, New Media and the Public”) said that negative comments even affect how others interpret the main discussion:

So basically just being exposed to rude comments, even if the content of the comments themselves was the same, made people react differently to the content of the story. So the question is therefore: What do we do to encourage better understanding? … And then we should discuss what does it mean to have a civil discussion online.

Systems like Facebook and LinkedIn certainly allow people to comment on their own lives and other people’s posts, and they’re obviously popular. It may feel safer in those systems because you only sign up if you want to do it, and you have a controlled audience (depending on how well you understand and use your privacy settings).

UI issues in commenting

The commenting UI itself sometimes gets in the way, as I saw in a usability study awhile ago. The commenting form might appear at the top or bottom of the article. It’s not useful at the top, because you haven’t read anything yet. You might not get to the bottom to see the form there if you don’t read the whole article. And if you print the article to read, there’s no easy way to post a comment. Having a link float on the page so it’s always visible might be helpful but requires careful testing to see how people react to something that keeps moving.

In a system with a lot of topics (whether they’re courses, articles or products), many items may have few or no comments at all. That may make them look unpopular. Seeding a discussion, by having a staff member or the author post the first comment or question might help it look less like a vacant lot and more like a conversation.

Creating a sense of community

I belong to a professional email list that is for members only. That restriction is useful; it’s one of the things that the moderators do to make people comfortable. Even though most of us will never meet, we have a definite sense of community from having helped each other on topics of mutual interest.

In one recent study, a man indicated that he writes comments in an online course’s discussion area. When I asked for details, it turned out that he hadn’t written anything at all. He was really talking about what he might do, not what he actually does. (That’s why it’s important to not simply accept what people say in customer research and usability studies.) He prefers to talk with friends who also take the class; it seemed that he was just more comfortable with people he knows.

Your turn…

…In what situations do you post comments, if any? What makes you nervous or comfortable about doing it? Should we moderate comments, or let anyone say anything? Is it different if it’s social or professional? And don’t worry – I moderate the comments here and won’t let anyone be rude.


Security questions: helpful self-service feature, confusion, or security risk?

11 Sep 2012

Question: What was your favorite teacher’s youngest child’s first pet’s name?
Answer 1: StupidQuestion TeacherPet Booyah
Answer 2: Green polka dots
See why, below

As part of account creation, many sites require you to answer secret questions. This isn’t only for security. It provides a self-service way for you to reset your password, which is easier for the company, and maybe for you, too. (Remember when you used to call customer care for things like this?) But security questions can be hard to design and use.

Problems with security questions

A system must present users with enough questions so they can pick a couple to answer and remember. Here are some questions and categories that can cause problems:

  • “Where was your first kiss?”  I’ve seen this make some people laugh, but embarrass others.
  • “What’s your favorite …?” Preferences change often, so answers are hard to remember.
  • “What was your phone number growing up?  Let users know if hyphens, parentheses and spaces count.
  • “What’s your youngest child’s first name?”  If you have another child later (or have none), this won’t work.
  • Marriage dates, location or attendants.  Not everyone is married.
  • Pet names or types.  Some people don’t have pets.

Here are some real examples from 2012, when I wrote this post: the first is from Yahoo.com, the second from BarnesAndNoble.com. How many questions could you answer now and remember later? How many just leave you scratching your head?

Some of the secret questions at yahoo.com

Secret questions at yahoo.com

 

Secret questions from BarnesAndNoble.com

Secret questions from BarnesAndNoble.com

 

And there’s the question of whether security questions are useful at all. GoodSecurityQuestions.com points out that

The reality is, security questions present an opportunity for breach and even the best security questions are not good enough to screen out all attacks. There is a trade-off; self-service vs. security risks.

People who know you may know enough to answer your questions; people who don’t know you may be able to find out the answers (how many people on Facebook and LinkedIn know what schools you went to?).

I just came across an interesting example at the Minor League Baseball sites. When I indicated that I’d forgotten my password, I got this screen. Oddly, I had to remember which security question I’d answered before I could answer it.  [Added 25 Sep 2012]

At the Minor League Baseball site, first you have to remember which question you answered and then answer it

At Minor League Baseball sites, first you have to remember which one question you originally  answered and then answer it

Solutions for users answering questions

One of the most interesting ideas I came across is to answer a completely different question. You might use “green polka dots” when the question is “What street did you grow up on?” That’s harder for someone to guess, but harder for you to remember unless you use it everywhere (which isn’t secure).

Danah Boyd, writing on Apophenia, suggests combining a “snarky bad attitude phrase” with a clue from the actual question, plus a unique word. For example, she writes “when I’m asked the following question: What is your favorite sports team? My answer would be: StupidQuestion SportsTeam Booyah“.

Solutions for designers picking questions to include

Here are some tips for selecting questions for your application:

  1. It’s OK to have some questions that don’t apply to everyone, but have enough choices so everyone can comfortably use a few.
  2. Questions shouldn’t be so obscure that people have to write their answers down.
  3. Answers shouldn’t be too easy for someone to figure out.
  4. Answers should be unique — there should be just one.
  5. Answers should be stable over time, unlike favorite things.
  6. Have reminders about punctuation and case, both for initial and subsequent entries.
  7. Consider allowing people to specify their own questions in case none of the provided ones work.

Usability testing helps

It may seem trivial to test security questions, but it does help. We got some good feedback in a recent project and changed the questions in our list. There’s nothing like showing your work to real users.